You are here: Home Asbestos News
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Search

mesothelioma

asbestos news

AstraZeneca's lung cancer drug has been submitted to the regulatory Zactima withdrawn

The top bit of drug manufacturers, AstraZeneca, has the United States and Europe to submit their talking about the management of lung cancer drug Zactima. As the chemotherapy drugs was regarded as an effective treatment for lung cancer.

In June of this year, AstraZeneca has already, as a potential treatment for large cell lung cancer in its advanced stage, is a new drug. With the United States and European authorities, touted as the most important of these submissions, the new 2009 submitted Zactima.

Decided to pulled the previous submission, they have managed to garner much attention, start a updated regulatory agencies and found that, overall, if the patient does not improve the survival chanc results of clinical research

 

99% of schools found Asbestos

Asbestos was found in about 99 percent of kindergartens, and elementary, middle and high schools inspected by the Education Ministry, according to data from the ministry. As of February, the ministry finished its inspection of 3,158 schools out of a total of 19,581. In 3,128 schools, or 99.1 percent of the total inspected, the substance, known to cause lung cancer if inhaled with a latent period of about 30 years, was found.

In a previous inspection conducted in 2007 on 100 schools, asbestos was found in 88 percent of them. The data was released yesterday by Rep. Kim Choon-jin of the Democratic Party, who belongs to the National Assembly's Education, Science and Technology Committee.

Of the 3,128 schools, the number of the schools in "significant damaged condition" was 22. Eight elementary schools, seven middle schools, six high schools and one special education institution were rated as being in that category.

If damaged parts of a school building, which was constructed with materials containing asbestos, account for 10 percent or more of the total size of the building, it is to be listed as being in "significant damaged condition."

If damaged parts account for less than 10 percent, the building is to be rated as being in "damaged condition."

An aide to Rep. Kim said the lawmaker will continue to work to rid schools across the nation of such health hazards.

The number of schools in "damaged condition" was 420. Fifteen kindergartens, 197 elementary schools, 108 middle schools, 97 high schools and three special education institutions made the list.

"We are exploring various ways, including seeking legislative action, to remove and better manage asbestos remaining in school buildings. We will consult cases abroad," the aide said.

To ease public concerns over asbestos, the government has conducted a full-scale inspection into all schools across the nation since September last year. It plans to establish a database with the inspection results by the end of this year to effectively rid schools of the hazardous substance, officials said.

 

Asbestos group angry about refusal to reverse pleural plaques decision

The British government has decided not to restore compensation for victims of pleural plaques, a scarring of the lungs caused by asbestos exposure.

The York Asbestos Support Group had been advocating for the Law Lords to overturn a decision to block insurance company payouts to people with pleural plaques.

The Lords, however, stood by their decision that asbestos victims should not receive compensation until or unless they later develop full-blown diseases like mesothelioma. Instead, pleural plaque victims will be offered £5,000, paid for by taxpayers.

The support group is angry about this decision, and a spokeswoman said that many mesothelioma victims will never have a chance to recover compensation, as claims cannot even be investigated until patients are diagnosed, and the disease sometimes progresses quickly.

Before the Lords made the decision to block payout for pleural plaques in 2007, the awards expedited later claims for more serious asbestos-related diseases like mesothelioma, as claims could be easily revived and compensation could be awarded quickly.

A York government representative said that he was unaware of any government plans to block the proposals to change the law, and that he believes that employers and their insurers should pay compensation, not the taxpayers.

A spokesman from the Ministry of Justice stated that they are intending to publish a response to a paper on pleural plaques before summer recess begins.

 

Unite ensures asbestos victims’ claims honoured by Government

Unite’s intervention sees the Government put in to place legislation today (Monday) that will benefit hundreds of sufferers of the fatal asbestos cancer, mesothelioma, to the tune of thousands of pounds in compensation. The people affected were exposed to asbestos by Turner & Newall (T&N) the UK’s largest asbestos company which went into administration in 2001.

The former Secretary of State, John Hutton, exempted T&N’s claims from compensation recovery provisions of the Social Security (Recovery of Benefits) Act 1997. This was because Federal Mogul's (T&N’s new owners) Chapter 11 bankruptcy exit plan resulted in T&N asbestos claimants receiving only a small fraction of their entitlement to compensation, in many cases as little as 17%. This exemption came in to force in 2006.

At that time it was also understood that T&N claimants were entitled to the state payment under the Pneumoconiosis 1979 Act. It was further understood that the sum of both payments fell well short of the total amount claimants should have received. The Government gave a clear intention not to penalise T&N claimants twice.

Unite the union with Terry Rooney MP acted swiftly to bring to the attention of the Government a consequence of the Child Maintenance and Other Payments Act 2008 and related legislation which ran contrary to an agreement the union had brokered in 2006 to exempt T&N victims from the requirement to repay DWP benefits from their compensation. Due to the uniqueness of the T&N asbestos victims’ position, special measures were needed to ensure that they were not unfairly penalised under the new legislation. The decision today reinstates the exemption for T&N claims from the Government’s Compensation Recovery Unit.

Derek Simpson, Unite Joint General Secretary, said:

“We are delighted that the Government has put this right. Had it not been for Unite’s prompt intervention this problem would have remained unchecked to the disadvantage of many mesothelioma sufferers and their families. This decision will benefit our members and countless other T&N asbestos victims who have suffered serious pain and loss of life, and it will aid their families who have to care for them.

“The union stepped in because it was wrong that workers condemned to an agonising death and their grieving loved ones were facing their compensation being so drastically cut. It was an important point of principle which Unite was committed to getting resolved.

“The new legislation was intended to benefit people with mesothelioma but it also resulted in compensation payments to victims from the T&N Trust being drastically reduced or extinguished altogether. The determined action taken by Unite was instrumental in raising this issue at the highest possible level and achieving a fair and just political solution.”

ENDS

For more information contact Brian Gallagher on 07957 995947 or John O’Regan, Unite Political Officer, on 020 7420 8950 or Ashraf Choudhury in the Unite Press Office on 020 7420 8914 or 07980 224761.

 

Gordon Brown accused of U-turn over compensation for asbestos victims

By Nick Sommerlad on Jul 10, 09 09:21 AM in Campaign updates

Bad news from our political editor Bob Roberts. Here's the exclusive story he's written for today's paper:

Asbestos victims last night accused Gordon Brown of betrayal as it was revealed the Government will do a U-turn over promises to help them.

Senior Government sources admitted that campaigners pushing for the right of pleural plaques sufferers to get payouts from insurance firms would be "disappointed".

Pleural plaques causes a scarring of the lungs and is an early sign of lung cancer linked to asbestos. Thousands of workers, mainly in the construction industry, have been affected by the symptoms.

But a Law Lords ruling says they cannot get insurance compensation until they develop full-blown lung diseases and sometimes only have weeks to live.

Overturning that ruling is one of the five demands of the Mirror's Asbestos Timebomb campaign.

The PM has repeatedly promised justice for the workers but a senior Government source said giving compensation payouts before a disease develops would be crossing a line. Reports also showed just having pleural plaques was not harmful.

The senior Whitehall source added: "The problem is the Chief Medical Officer and the Industrial Injuries Advisory Committee have both concluded more firmly than ever before that pleural plaques are not harmful.

"They have both advised us against restoring compensation. That makes it much harder to overturn the Lords ruling.

"But we want to do as much as we can to help people who are suffering or who are likely to suffer from exposure to asbestos."

The Government is expected to offer pleural plaques victims £5,000 payments, funded by the taxpayer, instead of compensation from insurance companies.

An online research centre into asbestos-related diseases is also expected to be set up.

But Alan Ritchie of builders' workers union UCATT said: "This is a complete betrayal of working-class people. Compensation for pleural plaques is not only about the medical evidence.

"The point is that workers were negligently exposed to asbestos, have been told that their lungs have been damaged as a result of that exposure and now have to live with the fear of developing a fatal asbestos disease."

Tony Whiston of the Manchester Asbestos Support Group said: "It's disastrous news. It's a windfall for insurers. If the Government refuses to change the law it must look at other means to compensate sufferers."

The £5,000 payments are expected to go to all 6,500 pleural plaques victims whose cases are on hold. But there will no compensation paid to anyone who develops pleural plaques in future.

Earlier this year Gordon Brown promised legal action. He said: "Asbestosis is a terrible disease. Those who suffer it deserve the best help from public authorities." Justice Secretary Jack Straw is expected to make an official statement next week.

CASE STUDY 1

Richard Robson only worked with asbestos for two years but it has scarred him for life.

The 79-year-old explained: "I've been coughing up phlegm day and night for about five years now. I can't walk far without stopping for breath.

"Seven years ago I started to lose my breath. I was told it was pleural plaques and since then it's got worse."

He added: "I never thought about pleural plaques. I did not even know what they were. The only place I ever worked with asbestos was the Swan Hunter shipyard in Wallsend.

"I worked in ships' engine rooms and we used to see the asbestos rain down from above like silver."

CASE STUDY 2

Alex Stewart was 16 when he began work as a shipwright on the Clyde. At 69, the legacy of his trade is pleural plaques. He was surrounded in the shipyards by asbestos used to lag pipes.

Alex said: "They would come in with this stuff and just slap it on the pipes next to us with their hands.

"Nobody told us it was dangerous or gave us special clothing."

Alex, diagnosed four years ago, added: "My throat is raw. My nose runs. I've trouble breathing. A few of my workmates have it.

"I was at another's funeral six months ago. People should be compensated when exposed to this stuff through no fault of their own."

 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  10 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »
Page 1 of 39